Turbonetics Turbochargers Compressor maps, configurations, and in depth data on Turbonetics Turbochargers

Car Town
Reply
 
Old 04-08-2008, 11:51 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default T-66 swap question.

Hey all/robert,

I switched from a T-66 S-trim .81 AR (OC) to the identical turbo but Q-trim .96 AR... as an experiment in lag/flow.

Interestingly, I noticed that backpressure (pre-turbo) seemed to go up as we lost 1psi of boost telling me that there is more pressure on the bottom of the WG. Does this sound right?

I realize that the S-trim is a better flowing wheel than the Q, but is it so much better that a .81 to .96 actually made BP go up? None of these turbines are F1 style wheels btw.

Thanks for the help.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookShare on MySpace
Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 08:26 AM
Robert's Avatar
Administrator
Turbonetics Owners Club Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,329
Send a message via AIM to Robert Send a message via Yahoo to Robert
Default Re: T-66 swap question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icicleboy
Hey all/robert,

I switched from a T-66 S-trim .81 AR (OC) to the identical turbo but Q-trim .96 AR... as an experiment in lag/flow.

Interestingly, I noticed that backpressure (pre-turbo) seemed to go up as we lost 1psi of boost telling me that there is more pressure on the bottom of the WG. Does this sound right?

I realize that the S-trim is a better flowing wheel than the Q, but is it so much better that a .81 to .96 actually made BP go up? None of these turbines are F1 style wheels btw.

Thanks for the help.
Actually the S trim is an F1 style wheel and yes it does flow THAT much better then a Q trim..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookShare on MySpace
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 02:04 AM
ash ash is offline
Turbonetics Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Default Re: T-66 swap question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icicleboy
Hey all/robert,

I switched from a T-66 S-trim .81 AR (OC) to the identical turbo but Q-trim .96 AR... as an experiment in lag/flow.

Interestingly, I noticed that backpressure (pre-turbo) seemed to go up as we lost 1psi of boost telling me that there is more pressure on the bottom of the WG. Does this sound right?

I realize that the S-trim is a better flowing wheel than the Q, but is it so much better that a .81 to .96 actually made BP go up? None of these turbines are F1 style wheels btw.

Thanks for the help.
===================================\

i had seen simular
some turbo engines we build, we order Q trim turbines.
the Q trim is LESS efficent than the S trim
this creates a better low and mid range power band.
The S trim wheel is really good for all out rpm and high gas transfer.

eg.
some drift cars actually need more mid range power, and on/ off / on turbo response....

the only way to gain this knowledge is years of R & D.....
seek out a "older" or " seasoned" turbo design or development guy, for speciallised appications...

cheers
ash
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookShare on MySpace
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
62-1 swap compressor and wheels to T61 /HP61 JST4FN Tech Support 1 01-06-2009 11:31 AM
T66 swap icicleboy Tech Support 1 04-10-2008 10:12 AM
Turbonetics S14 with VQ35 swap!!! Robert Turbonetics in the Media 0 04-25-2007 09:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0