gtk 1000 / 850

ash · Tweet this Post! #1 (**permalink**) 02-06-2008, 03:10 AM

just recieved 2 new turbonetics hybrids
gtk 1000 / 850

they will be going onto a small block chev,
358 cubes, or 5.83 liters
there will be 1 turbo per bank

that makes it 2.9 liters per gtk 1000 / 850

what sort of power will it make once turned up full noise???

the .81 a/r housings where ordered due to the 2.9 liters each bank, and the fuel system being mechical injection. ( no power adders to aid spool up).

what would the max flow through the gtk 850 turbine housing, at .81 a/r??
cheers
ash

TurboKits.com · Tweet this Post! #2 (**permalink**) 02-06-2008, 08:57 AM

What boost?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ash

just recieved 2 new turbonetics hybrids
gtk 1000 / 850

they will be going onto a small block chev,
358 cubes, or 5.83 liters
there will be 1 turbo per bank

that makes it 2.9 liters per gtk 1000 / 850

what sort of power will it make once turned up full noise???

the .81 a/r housings where ordered due to the 2.9 liters each bank, and the fuel system being mechical injection. ( no power adders to aid spool up).

what would the max flow through the gtk 850 turbine housing, at .81 a/r??
cheers
ash

ash · Tweet this Post! #3 (**permalink**) 02-06-2008, 06:51 PM

30- 40 psi
or what ever the max power is obtained from gtk 1000 comp side

thanks
ash

TurboKits.com · Tweet this Post! #4 (**permalink**) 02-07-2008, 08:09 AM

I think 1400 WHP is not out of the question...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ash

30- 40 psi
or what ever the max power is obtained from gtk 1000 comp side

thanks
ash

ash · Tweet this Post! #5 (**permalink**) 02-07-2008, 03:25 PM

hmmm
they where bought for max effort, and the produce at least 1600 hp flywheel , if not more

ash

TurboKits.com · Tweet this Post! #6 (**permalink**) 02-07-2008, 04:24 PM

Yeah, 1600 Flywheel should not be a problem... I was saying 1400 to the wheels! Which is about 1700 - 1750 flywheel HP

Quote:

Originally Posted by ash

hmmm
they where bought for max effort, and the produce at least 1600 hp flywheel , if not more

ash

ash · Tweet this Post! #7 (**permalink**) 02-07-2008, 06:51 PM

ok,
thanks for reply.
looking at the other turbonetics turbo combo's and comparision sheets, the super T comp housing , Hp 76 wheel with .81 a/r housing should go 900- 950 ish with 3 litre engine

we have gtk comp housing, hp 76 comp wheel, .81 a/r turbine housing, gtk S trim turbine wheel. and 2.9 liter ( 4 cylinder per bank ... 1/2 v8 chev ..) per turbo.

so idealy, each turbo could produce up to 900 ish hp each ???

what do you think??

cheers
ash

TurboKits.com · Tweet this Post! #8 (**permalink**) 02-08-2008, 07:32 AM

Yes, it will ultimately depend on the BSFC, but since the car is strickly drag I am sure you #s will be high!

Keep the board updated, I want to know how the combo does for you...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ash

ok,
thanks for reply.
looking at the other turbonetics turbo combo's and comparision sheets, the super T comp housing , Hp 76 wheel with .81 a/r housing should go 900- 950 ish with 3 litre engine

we have gtk comp housing, hp 76 comp wheel, .81 a/r turbine housing, gtk S trim turbine wheel. and 2.9 liter ( 4 cylinder per bank ... 1/2 v8 chev ..) per turbo.

so idealy, each turbo could produce up to 900 ish hp each ???

what do you think??

cheers
ash

ash · Tweet this Post! #9 (**permalink**) 02-09-2008, 07:03 AM

i have flowed fuel tune ups for a few bsfc's
all between 1 lb of fuel per hp per hour... up tp 1.5 lb of fuel per hp per hour...
mechical fuel injection takes abit more time than carby or efi....

that is not the problem, have paid for mistakes made on tune, camshafts wrongly bought from " guro" turbo tuners... etc, when a product is said to be able to do xyz....... so it should.....
Even when unreal correction figures , are added to dyno figures, they only just scrap in...

Basicly trying to get a insite on the turbonetics flow capeablities on there product......

Is about time they ( turbonetics) produced comp maps for there products...

Had 2 failures ( gtk 550's) due to sub standard quality inspecition process , it would be not too soon for turbonetics to help out on the product backup...
have sat on my hands, still pushing the "good" name of turbonetics.

looking forward to any input
regards
ash

TurboKits.com · Tweet this Post! #10 (**permalink**) 02-11-2008, 08:51 AM

I have seen about 700 Wheel HP at 42-45 PSI on a 2.0L, single turbo, so I am sure your set up will do even better and should be able to hit the #s you are looking for

Quote:

Originally Posted by ash

i have flowed fuel tune ups for a few bsfc's
all between 1 lb of fuel per hp per hour... up tp 1.5 lb of fuel per hp per hour...
mechical fuel injection takes abit more time than carby or efi....

that is not the problem, have paid for mistakes made on tune, camshafts wrongly bought from " guro" turbo tuners... etc, when a product is said to be able to do xyz....... so it should.....
Even when unreal correction figures , are added to dyno figures, they only just scrap in...

Basicly trying to get a insite on the turbonetics flow capeablities on there product......

Is about time they ( turbonetics) produced comp maps for there products...

Had 2 failures ( gtk 550's) due to sub standard quality inspecition process , it would be not too soon for turbonetics to help out on the product backup...
have sat on my hands, still pushing the "good" name of turbonetics.

looking forward to any input
regards
ash